View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
IddinLunasglory Member
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 504 Location: Denver Co
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 3:53 pm Post subject: your advice please |
|
|
Hey all....
ive decided to give up on my homebuild and buy a new computer...
what im asking is for any advice from anyone about where to go for a PC that is stable but UNDER 1K (including s&h) !!
I dont need a screaming machine just something >2gig processor (prefere AMD to pentium but not avid about it)
would like a decent sound card as well
only must is a 256 Nvida vid card.
I was looking at "Cyberpower" they had good ratings in the magazines I read. but i saw a few realy nasty experiences with them at epinons.com
I was not impressed with the selection at Dell (only 256 card they had was an AMD)
I really want a full system with every thing i need that will have support. something i dont need to upgrade for a bit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shiloch Veneficus Administrator
Joined: 06 Dec 2001 Posts: 1946 Location: All My Base Are Belong to You
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Elnrik Talshiar Member
Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 820 Location: Denver, CO
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IddinLunasglory Member
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 504 Location: Denver Co
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
actually Cyberpower had this i was looking at..
X-Dreamer Case 350W w/ Window (SILVER)
AMD Athlon XP-2600+ Processor ~ CL205
Albatron Nforce2 Ultra DDR 400 Dual Channel MB w/ Audio & Lan
512 MB PC3200 400MHz DDR MEMORY (Major_Brand)
MAXTOR 120GB 7200 RPM ATA 133 HARD DRIVE
NONE - 2nd Hard Drive
nVidia GeForce-FX 5200 256MB DDR W/ TV OUT & DVI
ARTEC 16X DVD ROM (BEIGE)
ARTEC CD-RW 52X24X52 (BEIGE)
NONE - MONITOR
Creative Labs SB AUDIGY 5.1 W/ 1394 IEEE
Price: $739.00
I guess almost every computer i have had was an AMD since they came out.. i am not really opposed to Intell and if i found a good deal i would get one. They tend to be much higher priced systems in my experience.
I already have a monitor that is just fine so dont really need one
As for the 258 vid card.. i was under the impresion that the new Doom3 and half life will need a 256 card to run them... ? both these games i definatly plan on playing
Last edited by IddinLunasglory on Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:53 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IddinLunasglory Member
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 504 Location: Denver Co
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
compare to the same system with an intel
X-Dreamer Case 350W w/ Window (SILVER)
(800FSB) Intel Pentium 4 CPU @ 2.6GHz 512K ~ C2024
ABIT IS7-E I865PE 800FSB AGP8X Mboard
512MB (256MBx2) PC3200 DDR400 Dual Channel
120GB 7200 RPM ATA 100 HARD DRIVE
NONE - 2nd Hard Drive
nVidia GeForce-FX 5200 256MB DDR W/ TV OUT & DVI
ARTEC 16X DVD ROM (BEIGE)
ARTEC CD-RW 52X24X52 (BEIGE)
NONE - MONITOR
Creative Labs SB AUDIGY 5.1 W/ 1394 IEEE
Price: $886.00 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Elnrik Talshiar Member
Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 820 Location: Denver, CO
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
OR... hehehe
ATX MEDIUM TOWER CASE 350 WATT (BLACK)
(800Mhz FSB) Intel Pentium 4 CPU @ 2.6GHz 512K w/ Hyper Threading
ABIT IS7-E I865PE 800FSB AGP8X Mboard (with SATA)
512MB (256MBx2) PC3200 DDR400 Dual Channel (Corsair_XMS)
MAXTOR 200GB 7200 RPM Serial ATA 150 8MB CACHE HARD DRIVE
NONE - Hard Drive
ATI RADEON 9800 SE 128MB DDR AGP 8X W/ TV-OUT & DVI
ARTEC 16X DVD ROM (BLACK)
ARTEC CD-RW 52X24X52 (BLACK)
NONE - MONITOR
3D WAVE ON-BOARD 5.1 SOUND CARD
Price: $996.00
It's not much more, but going with Corsair memory, Serial ATA hard drive, and the ATI 9800 vid card should increase performance from the Intel config you selected up there. After the PC arrives, head to a PC store and buy a Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS card for $79.99 and you're golden.
Just my 2cp. But then... I'm sure it's easier for me to spend your money that is for you to spend your money.
As for Doom3, etc etc etc, you'll need a video card capable of using programmable shaders. I'm pretty sure a 128mb card will run just fine. Someone correct me if that's wrong. _________________
(AKA - Brent) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IddinLunasglory Member
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 504 Location: Denver Co
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
unfortunatly after my experience with 3 ATI cards in a row i wil never get one again
but nice system config hehe |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daneloire Member
Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 749 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
The one thing I notice about those systems you mentioned is the meager power supply. If you're going to run a high-end processor and still expect to power a number of system fans, hard drives, cd-burners, whatever... 350W is a very low number. For a gaming PC, I'd recommend maybe one of Enermax's 420W NoiseTaker power supplies.
-Dane |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shiloch Veneficus Administrator
Joined: 06 Dec 2001 Posts: 1946 Location: All My Base Are Belong to You
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
The $886 machine is a good buy.
I read up on Doom 3 AND Half-Life 2 (which I think is going to be a huge disappointment), and couldn't find any specific information about system specs for either, other than id Software plans to make Doom 3 tailored for higher-end machines. Half-Life 2, which currently has no release date, hasn't made any promises other than they say they're tailoring the engine to run smoothly on lower-end systems.
In the end, its all going to come down to how much money you want to spend. You can turn off anti-aliasing and a couple other goo-gaw graphics effects and still get a refresh of 60hz out of Doom 3 most likely, with a 128 MB graphics card.
If you plan to do this type of high-end, cutting-edge gaming, why you'd want to do that on an AMD processor boggles my mind. Paying 740ish for an AMD when you can get an Intel for 890 is well worth the price of getting the Intel.
Despite many years of development, AMD still doesn't measure up to Intel for stability, and life span. I've often took that sleezebo way out of getting more bang for the buck out of a budget, and it failed me every time. I do a lot of process-intensive database applications, graphic rendering, and just general use where I've had lock-ups, random reboots, crashes, and overall speed problems with AMD processors, closely followed by burn-outs.
Its a good buy if your computer is only on 4 hours a day and you do word processing and spreadsheets. Gaming is one of the computer industry's most hardware-demanding facets, and I just would not trust that to something paper-thin like AMD. _________________ Sage Shiloch Venzolmes - Arch Convoker - Walkers
QUALITY, not quantity. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jiminie Member
Joined: 17 Nov 2003 Posts: 68 Location: Brighton CO
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
You've gotten lots of good advice here bro.
Thought I would throw in my opinion on Nvidia however. I have had the same experience you had with crap cards tho these were all with the Nvidia chipset, which I will never buy again lol.
ATI is the way to go says I. Just something to think about fer both of us I suppose. Bad cards might not always be related to chipset maker...
Good Luck,
Jiminie _________________ If I had a SIG it would be here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Elnrik Talshiar Member
Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 820 Location: Denver, CO
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2004 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm with Jiminie on this,
ATI has had better rated graphics cards, performance wise, and have been rock solid for me.
And I'll also agree with Shi, Intel > AMD.
As far as the power supply thingy, 350 is teh suk, I'll agree totally. _________________
(AKA - Brent) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shiloch Veneficus Administrator
Joined: 06 Dec 2001 Posts: 1946 Location: All My Base Are Belong to You
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2004 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Bad cards might not always be related to chipset maker... |
That couldn't be more true. There could be any number of factors that play into a card going bad, or causing crashes. nVidia and ATI both sell their chipsets to many different manufacturers.
I can't speak for every manufacturer out there, but between the two companies, I will always use nVidia.
We have a department here with several engineers that do work with 3D rendering programs... Solidworks and SmartCAM, etc. In not just mine, but their experience, they've been through probably every type of video card/processor combination you can think of, and after at least a hundred trials and errors, we finally settled down to nVidia chipsets. ATI (like AMD) can bring performance boosts, can render a few milliseconds faster, but is prone to short life span and instability.
When you're racking out several thousand dollars each year on this type of hardware, you go with what is the most stable, and lasts the longest. _________________ Sage Shiloch Venzolmes - Arch Convoker - Walkers
QUALITY, not quantity. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Elnrik Talshiar Member
Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 820 Location: Denver, CO
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2004 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | ATI (like AMD) can bring performance boosts, can render a few milliseconds faster, but is prone to short life span and instability. |
!!!!
I haven't experienced either short life spans or instability, even overclocked, on my ATIs. _________________
(AKA - Brent) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Talvarien Member
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Posts: 609
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daneloire Member
Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 749 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2004 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Everyone has to be good at something
-Dane |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|